System Fragmentation

​

Three Layers of Disconnect

​

Layer 1: Examination Fragmentation

India operates 150+ separate entrance examination systems: National Level:

• JEE Main & Advanced (Engineering)
• NEET (Medical)
• CUET (Central Universities)
• CLAT (Law)
• GATE (Postgraduate)
• CAT, MAT, XAT (Management)

State Level:

• 28 different State Engineering Common Entrance Tests
• 28 different State Medical entrance examinations
• State-specific university entrance tests
• Domain-specific tests (Agriculture, Veterinary, Pharmacy)

Institutional Level:

• 200+ universities conduct proprietary entrance tests
• Private institutions with separate examinations
• Deemed universities with independent testing

Impact: A typical engineering aspirant takes 4-6 different entrance exams across 3-4 testing bodies, each with separate registration, different syllabi, and non-comparable scoring systems.

​

Layer 2: Counselling Fragmentation

After examinations, students must navigate multiple non-communicating counselling systems: Critical Problem: Zero interoperability. A seat accepted in one system doesn’t automatically release seats in others, creating the “seat blocking” crisis.

​

Layer 3: Verification Fragmentation

Document verification occurs independently at each stage:

1. Examination Registration: Upload Class 10/12 marksheets, caste certificates
2. Counselling: Re-upload identical documents to different portal
3. Provisional Admission: Physical verification at institution
4. Final Admission: Yet another verification by college administration
5. Auxiliary Services: Separate verification for hostel, scholarships

Average: Students submit the same Class 12 marksheet 4.2 times during one admission cycle.

​

Why Systems Don’t Talk

​

Technical Reasons

• Different technology stacks (some systems from 1990s)
• No standardized data formats
• Proprietary databases with no APIs
• Security concerns preventing data sharing

​

Institutional Reasons

• Each body operates as independent silo
• No regulatory mandate for interoperability
• Resistance to losing institutional autonomy
• Legacy contracts with different vendors

​

Policy Reasons

• No national standard for admission processes
• Different regulatory bodies (UGC, AICTE, MCI) with separate guidelines
• State vs. Central jurisdiction ambiguities
• Court interventions creating exceptions

​

The Information Disconnect

​

No Real-Time Data Flow

Current Reality:

• Seat vacancy data updated manually (2-3 day lag)
• Merit list movements unknown to students
• No way to track position in waiting list
• Results declared in “batches” causing uncertainty

What Students Experience:

• Constant portal refreshing (average: 50+ times/day during counselling)
• Reliance on unofficial Telegram/WhatsApp groups
• Anxiety from lack of transparent information
• Server crashes during result announcements

​

No Cross-System Rank Comparison

Different examination bodies use different scoring systems: Impact: Students cannot make informed choices when institutions accept multiple examination scores.

​

The Cost of Fragmentation

​

For Students

• Time: 187 hours average spent navigating multiple systems
• Money: ₹21,900 average expenditure per student
• Stress: 67% report high anxiety during admission season

​

For Institutions

• Administrative Burden: 4,500 staff hours per admission cycle
• Technology Costs: ₹22.8 lakhs per institution annually
• Seat Wastage: 18% average seats remain unfilled

​

For System

• Total Economic Loss: ₹89,950 crore annually
• Opportunity Loss: 5 lakh students drop out of process
• Efficiency Loss: 6-month process should take 6 weeks

​

What Unified Infrastructure Means

Superadmission eliminates fragmentation through: